Open Menu Open Menu

    COVID-19 IP and Trademark

    Trouble in USTPO Paradise? As the Pandemic Continues, Trademark Registrants Face Filing Hurdles

    Sanje Lara
    By Sanje Lara   |   Member

    2020 has been the year of unprecedented challenges, but also resilience and transformation. Although it has been a roller-coaster ride, we have all been forced to step up to the challenges, adapt, show courage and find solutions. As we near the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic, trademark maintenance deadlines in 2021 create new obstacles for registrants. To maintain a federal trademark registration, registrants must periodically file an affidavit of use under Section 8 swearing that the mark is in use in commerce or that the registrant has an acceptable excuse for nonuse. Section 45 of the Trademark Act defines “use in commerce” as a bona fide use of a trademark in the ordinary course of trade. Another important point is that use in commerce must be lawful use. Without lawful use a party cannot establish trademark priority.

     

    The primary issue with these opportunistic applications—an inability to prove lawful use in commerce—presents the first roadblock to federal registration. Under the Lanham Act, registration is awarded to the first to file for and use the mark in commerce. Where a mark owner has yet to use its mark in commerce but has a bona fide intent to do so, it may file an intent-to-use application under Section 1(b), which allows an applicant to reserve a priority date. Not surprisingly, most of the applications related to COVID-19 are filed under Section 1(b).

     

    As part of a Section 8 affidavit of use filing, the registrant must make a verified statement that the mark is being used in commerce, or that the registrant has an excusable reason for nonuse, for each class of goods or services listed. In addition, for each class of goods or services, identify the specific goods or services listed in the registration for which the mark is still in use or for which there is excusable nonuse. Registrants must also delete goods or services that are no longer in use; and for each class of goods or services remaining, include a specimen showing how the mark is used in commerce.

     

    The registrant may likewise be obstructed from making the typical presentation of incontestability under Section 15 following five years’ use. Registrants and their lawyers should take alert with these filings, especially when the registrant’s business action has been seriously hindered by the pandemic and related lockdowns. Neither conception of the mark, nor advertising alone is sufficient to establish use. And racing to the USPTO to exploit another’s intent to make a legitimate use of a mark does not establish a bona fide intent. A common tactic or strategy of opportunistic applicants is to resort to token uses, or minor acts or sales, for example via a website, in an attempt to establish commercial use.

    Read Next


    CourtsCOVID-19

    Zoom Court: The Good, the Bad, and the Pajamas? How COVID-19 has Changed the Judicial System

    April 25, 2021By Loilette Pelier

    It has now been over a year since the world changed due to COVID-19. And while the world is still trying to adapt to the “new normal,” such as wearing masks and practicing social distancing, it is no secret that the court system is also trying to adapt. In order to prevent the spread of […]

    Read More

    COVID-19EconomyEnvironmentSchoolsTravel

    COVID-19’s Impact on The Environment: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

    May 13, 2021By PaulMarie Bobb

    It has been a little over a year since the COVID-19 Pandemic hit the United States and forced life as we knew it to come to a screeching halt. People were instructed to stay home, wear masks, remain six feet apart, and avoid crowds. For months, the world remained on lockdown whilst trying to flatten […]

    Read More

    Back to Top